Too easy maybe -- but funny as all get out. (all you need is to read the highlights in red and instant analysis in blue. Tis the best analysis for the busy conservative producer.) Really, just read the red and blue -- and see if you don't have the gist of the story. You will. And you'll laugh.
Obama voices concern about freed Guantanamo inmates--oh, he's still gonna free them, but he is "concerned" about it.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama said in an interview aired on Monday he worried that detainees freed from the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo, Cuba, might resume attacks on the United States.--well no kidding. What was your first clue?
But he told NBC News that closure of the prison was a matter of upholding U.S. values and law, and that a failure to do so would ultimately make Americans less secure.--No BHO, closing the prison is a matter of liberal stupidity which will make Americans less secure INSTANTLY.
"Can we guarantee that they're not going to try to participate in another attack? No," Obama said. "But what I can guarantee is that if we don't uphold our Constitution and our values, that over time that will make us less safe. And that will be a recruitment tool for organizations like al-Qaeda."--THAT OVER TIME is liberal speak for we're doing something stupid NOW and hoping that you will forget we did it over time.
In one of the first acts of his new administration, Obama, who was sworn in as U.S. president on January 20, signed an executive order directing that Guantanamo prison be closed within a year.--luckily for Obama, and maybe all of us, his idiot supporters don't have a memory that will last that long.
Some 250 terrorism suspects are being held at Guantanamo, many of them detained for years without charge and some subjected to interrogation that human rights groups say amounted to torture.
Obama critics note that even former President George W. Bush wanted to close Guantanamo. They say the difficult issue is deciding what to do with the inmates because they cannot be sent home for fear of torture, and other countries are unwilling to take them.--ok, so we can't send them to THEIR homes due to torture -- and we're the bad guys HOW in this equation?
There also are fears some may return to their attacks against the United States. Several of the detainees released by the Bush administration again became active in anti-U.S. militant groups.--well SHAZAAM!!! Who'd a thunk it?
"Is it going to be easy?" Obama asked in the interview. "No, because we've got a couple hundred of hard-core militants that, unfortunately, because of ... some problems that we had previously in gathering evidence, we may not be able to try in ordinary courts but we don't want to release."--let Dick Cheney try and get away with saying this.
But he expressed confidence that the administration would ultimately find a solution balancing security and U.S. legal values.
"I have to make the very best judgments I can make in terms of what's going to keep the American people safe and ... what's going to uphold our Constitution and our traditions of due process," Obama said. "And what I'm convinced of is -- we can balance those interests in a way that makes all of us proud but also assures that we're not attacked."--and what I am convinced of is that you are a constitutional idiot. There IS NO DUE PROCESS for the enemy. Never has been!
You know, My bro have to tell you, My bro really think its good this site and teh insight from everyone who participates. My bro find it to be
Cu
A friend of mine just emailed me one of your articles from a while back. I read that one a few more.
Anyway, what do you think about increase?
Cu Later
Moin
meself must say this is a really good article meself enjoyed reading it keep dha good work
i have a website aswell.
Cu Soon
You would think that they world have OKd it at teh beginning instead of allowing it to go so long without saying a thing and then bringing it back up when it was too late. yours truly dont understand it at all.
Would you be interested in exchanging site roll
Hi Homie
Keep up the good work. i just added your RSS feed
Sincerly
thank you very much, Ill try it out now!
Please email me if you are interested
Hi Homie
You know, you have to tell you, you really like this site and the insight from everyone who participates.
Goodbye
Thanks for the good post but do you optimize for Firefox. I was having a little trouble with my browser.
Hey are you a professional journalist? This article is very well written, as compared to most other sites i saw today. anyhow thank you quite much for the very nice read!
Knowledge Adopt,right meal sport convention chair external extend design telephone coffee forward send permanent deal hall make indeed offer rock historical face volume place revolution official route bring northern to yesterday screen chief move just may contribution okay left farmer sale carefully test among absolutely doubt define lunch deal bottom future move legal realise hand council weak post not establish perfect notice no design close later wonder basic conduct inside speech refuse who partner attend cause last nevertheless smile step circle light firm ordinary gate
You own a very rewarding blog. But a certain issue is still open How do you handle the raising amount of Spam in your blog comments? I do not like it at all, It wastes lots of my time and I really do not like messing around with this every day.
amazing advice thx... :)
regards,
This is without a doubt one of the more interesting websites I have seen. It's so easy to tune out, but there's truly still some fantastic stuff out there, and I think your site is on the list!
I totally am in awe of this site. definitely gonna need to put this on my blogroll.
I wanted to thank you for this excellent read!! I definitely loved every little bit of it. I have you bookmarked your site to check out the latest stuff you post.
Merely want to say your article is as tonishing. The clarity in your post is simply striking and i can take for granted you are an expert on this field. Well with your permission allow me to grab your rss feed to keep up to date with incoming post. Thanks a million and please keep up the good work.
Looks like he has a point, would anyone care to object.
The Joint Chiefs of Staff HAVE AN ABSOLUTE CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY to stand behind Guantanamo Military Judge James Pohl UNTIL OBAMA OVERCOMES “RES IPSA LOQUITUR” BY SUPPLYING HIS LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE AND PROVING HIS ELIGIBILITY TO BE PRESIDENT UNDER ARTICLE 2 OF THE US CONSTITUTION.